[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC: P-C not to PC
- Subject: Re: PC: P-C not to PC
- From: Stephen Vargo <anthrax2525@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Jc29nJA5F+tv5TQGYArQ3sJ9WembViRScV8r88PuWKgmnnNdVoowy+sHvmJI+e70GObhJgDcEUymzmG/K0Fb+fM4qjVzxmOfnv++zhewd8eP1/JEduBv35I+ACzaFPK8E5yvfdfZ4VdJ3lMt7sXkJIqB9WjpF4264Z2UnuIAHjI=;
That sounds rather smutty... ;)
I figure somebody was eventually going to say something to that effect.
Jerry Jordak <jer -AT- smellycat.com> wrote:
Binary attachments should be blocked on the list by default. Text files
apparently do go through as attachments. There is also a maximum allowed
message size in case a binary attachment would get through to stop the
message from sending.
Also, postings to the digest version are run through a MIME-stripper to
remove HTML and attachments from them.
If there are further questions about the list, please direct them to me
off-list at firstname.lastname@example.org so as not to waste list bandwidth. Thanks.
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
Main Index |