[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC: Re: F unit Dynamics - was NYC U33B
- Subject: Re: PC: Re: F unit Dynamics - was NYC U33B
- From: "Rick" <rtkiefer@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 09:43:29 -0500
Terry, for those that may not know, and to try and educate as to
the resources available, where did you obtain this information?
I know for the purposes of this site it is a good source of info, and it
is a good thing to pass on what you know to those who do not
know. Having said that, information given here should have its
souce sited a practice that should be adhered to only if to give the
original author proper credit.
On 27 May 2001, at 9:14, Terry Link wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "craig a levine" <alcoc636 -AT- juno.com>
> > On the subject of NYC units, did all their F units have dynamic
> > brakes?
> All NYC F units had dynamic brakes EXCEPT the passenger F3s.
> With Dynamics:
> FT A #1600-1603
> F2 A #1604-1605
> F3 A #1606-1635
> F7 A #1636-1873
> FT B #2400-2403
> F3 B #2404-2419
> F7 B #2420-2474
> Without Dynamics:
> F3 A #3500-3503 - renumbered #1874, 1875, - , 1877 (#3502 not
> converted and retired in 1961) F3 B #3600-3601 - renumbered #2475-2476
> When these passenger units were converted to freight service and
> renumbered, they did not have dynamic brakes added.
> Terry Link
> Bramalea, Ontario
> trlink -AT- canadasouthern.com
Main Index |