[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PC: Re: PC signal answers

I am pretty certain that the reason for the difference in signal styles east 
/ west of Buffalo was due to the fact that the "old" NYC was Buffalo to New 
York.  Then, the western portion was originally the Lake Shore and Michigan 
Southern Railroad until the Vanderbilts increased the proportions of their 
A lot of those signals west of Buffalo were reconfigured after the advent of 
the stack trains.  It was because of the height of the stacks that some 
trains couldn't see their signal aspects if a stacker intervened between 
their train and the signal masts.  Originally, this was remedied by turning 
the signals on one of the masts the other direction and rewiring them, so 
that a set was visible from each track on the outside.  Conrail started 
replacing the old signal heads in the early nineties, and probably CSX will 
continue to do the same.
Jim Kosty

>From: Mark_Branibar -AT- praxair.com
>Reply-To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
>To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
>Subject: PC: Re: PC signal question
>Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:23:40 -0500
>On the New York Central it seems that Buffalo was the dividing point for 
>types.  All of the signals east of CP 437 were of the single target 
>type.  All of the signals west of Buffalo were of the tri-color type 
>similar to
>the Reading's but were not "Reading-type".  There was one set of double 
>signals in Vermillion, Ohio that were of the single searchlight type but 
>replaced them in the mid 1990's.  Most of the signals currently on ex - NYC
>lines were there long before Conrail.

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Home | Main Index | Thread Index