[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PC: Re: RE: Re: LV C628s not all built to PC/PRR specs
- Subject: PC: Re: RE: Re: LV C628s not all built to PC/PRR specs
- From: "NEW HAVEN U25B" <ERIE-LACKAWANNA@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:36:40 -0500
RS-11's had cab-signals, radios since they were originally PRR units. So did
628's have radios. Cab-signals were required at Meeker Avenue, Newark since
this was a PRR connection
> Cab signals? They didn't even have radios. LV specs but not PRR.
> > ----------
> > From: NEW HAVEN U25B[SMTP:ERIE-LACKAWANNA -AT- prodigy.net]
> > Reply To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 4:48 PM
> > To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> > Subject: PC: Re: LV C628s not all built to PC/PRR specs
> > Yes, ALCO did rebuild Monon 400-409 to PRR specs. Nose mars light was
> > over, cab-signals and dynamic braking installed. Monon units did not
> > dynamics.
> > > The LV number 633-641 are the ex-Monon #400-#407. I don't believe that
> > Alco
> > > rebuilt these while in their used locomotive lot.
> > >
> > >
Main Index |