[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC: 1100 & Washboards
- Subject: Re: PC: 1100 & Washboards
- From: rastaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:35:56 -0600
From: james.s.torgeson -AT- delphiauto.com
To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
Date sent: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:16:29 -0400
Subject: Re: PC: 1100 & Washboards
Send reply to: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
> Thank you for correcting my mistake. I got aluminum and stainless steel confused.
Not being in the mechanical department, but the operating
department I do make these mistakes sometimes. I have seen
cars on the RIP Track with the sides removed the the steel framing
being reduced to about 1/2 its orgianal thickness due to corression
from the traped moisture. Sure is amazing how much steel is
> 1) Budd held the patent for Shotwelding stainless steel, not aluminum.
> 2) The stainless fluting on the sides of Budd cars and cars of other
> manufacturers is held on by clips. There is no insulation between the
> fluting and the car shell. The insulation resides between the exterior wall
> (car shell) and the interior walls.
> 3) There is no chemical reaction between stainless steel and steel.
> Stainless-sheathed cars made by Pullman and others rusted solely because of
> trapped moisture. High pressure car washers made matters worse by forcing
> water and possibly caustic cleaning solutions into the cavities between the
> sheathing and steel sides. Cars that looked great on the outside, were
> self-destructing, sight-unseen. Many railroads had no choice but to
> permanently strip off the stainless fluting and rebuild the car sides. In
> severe cases, cars were scrapped.
Main Index |