[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PC: Re: PC/TPW power pool
- Subject: Re: PC: Re: PC/TPW power pool
- From: "james koo" <l740@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:59:20 PST
Dear List Members,
Of all the ConRail predecessors, didn't only the Lehigh Valley(LV)
have the GP-38AC? I believe that the LV GP-38ACs had the extended cab
front wall. Unfortunately, I don't have the Conrail Motive Power
Review by Paul Withers, or Conrail, volume 1 or 2, by Scott Hartly on
me. Ditto for the Conrail Motive Power Review by Louis Marre, which
may also prove useful. Thank you.
>From: Conrailbob -AT- aol.com
>Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 11:20:22 EST
>To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
>Subject: Re: PC: Re: PC/TPW power pool
>Reply-To: penn-central -AT- smellycat.com
>In a message dated 11/24/98 6:33:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>pontiac -AT- dreamscape.com writes:
><< Also, the extended cab wall is for a specific type of dual control
> the two stands are linked to each other (The "Tandem" control stand)
> that you can change sides without changing any settings, aimed at
> and back-and-forth type service. only a few units ever had this,
> on PC, 10 PR-SL and 5 RDG SD45's that I know of, whereas other roads
> as EL had dual-control units that did not have this extended cab front
> required more work to set them up for running opposite-end forward.
> Did the PC's GP38AC's have the extended cab front wall as well?
> Bob D.
> Conrailbob -AT- aol.com
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Main Index |